Brad King 7c36d2067b cmListFileBacktrace: Refactor storage to provide efficient value semantics
Since commit v3.4.0-rc1~321^2~2 (Genex: Store a backtrace, not a pointer
to one, 2015-07-08) we treat cmListFileBacktrace instances as
lightweight values.  This was true at the time only because the
backtrace information was kept in the cmState snapshot hierarchy.
However, that forced us to accumulate a lot of otherwise short-lived
snapshots just to have the backtrace fields available for reference by
cmListFileBacktrace instances.  Recent refactoring made backtrace
instances independent of the snapshot hierarchy to avoid accumulating
short-lived snapshots.  This came at the cost of making backtrace values
heavy again, leading to lots of string coying and slower execution.

Fix this by refactoring cmListFileBacktrace to provide value semantics
with efficient shared storage underneath.  Teach cmMakefile to maintain
its call stack using an instance of cmListFileBacktrace.  This approach
allows the current backtrace to be efficiently saved whenever it is
needed.

Also teach cmListFileBacktrace the notion of a file-level scope.  This
is useful for messages about the whole file (e.g. during parsing) that
are not specific to any line within it.  Push the CMakeLists.txt scope
for each directory and never pop it.  This ensures that we always have
some context information and simplifies cmMakefile::IssueMessage.
Push/pop a file-level scope as each included file is processed.  This
supersedes cmParseFileScope and improves diagnostic message context
information in a few places.  Fix the corresponding test cases to expect
the improved output.
2016-04-18 09:21:19 -04:00
..
2015-12-10 23:09:16 +00:00
2014-09-16 09:06:29 -04:00
2015-03-06 11:18:19 -05:00
2014-09-16 09:06:29 -04:00
2016-03-09 09:42:18 -05:00
2016-03-09 09:42:18 -05:00
2013-10-08 08:37:50 -04:00
2014-08-20 10:19:49 -04:00
2016-03-09 09:42:18 -05:00
2002-12-03 11:21:12 -05:00
2010-06-11 14:30:44 -04:00

If you think about adding a new testcase then here is a small checklist you
can run through to find a proper place for it. Go through the list from the
beginning and stop once you find something that matches your tests needs,
i.e. if you will test a module and only need the configure mode use the
instructions from section 2, not 3.

1. Your testcase can run in CMake script mode, i.e. "cmake -P something"

Put your test in Tests/CMakeTests/ directory as a .cmake.in file. It will be
put into the test binary directory by configure_file(... @ONLY) and run from
there. Use the AddCMakeTest() macro in Tests/CMakeTests/CMakeLists.txt to add
your test to the test runs.

2. Your test needs CMake to run in configure mode, but will not build anything

This includes tests that will build something using try_compile() and friends,
but nothing that expects add_executable(), add_library(), or add_test() to run.

If the test configures the project only once and it must succeed then put it
into the Tests/CMakeOnly/ directory.  Create a subdirectory named like your
test and write the CMakeLists.txt you need into that subdirectory. Use the
add_CMakeOnly_test() macro from Tests/CMakeOnly/CMakeLists.txt to add your
test to the test runs.

If the test configures the project with multiple variations and verifies
success or failure each time then put it into the Tests/RunCMake/ directory.
Read the instructions in Tests/RunCMake/CMakeLists.txt to add a test.

3. If you are testing something from the Modules directory

Put your test in the Tests/Modules/ directory. Create a subdirectory there
named after your test. Use the ADD_TEST_MACRO macro from Tests/CMakeLists.txt
to add your test to the test run. If you have put your stuff in
Tests/Modules/Foo then you call it using ADD_TEST_MACRO(Module.Foo Foo).

4. You are doing other stuff.

Find a good place ;) In doubt mail to cmake-developers@cmake.org and ask for
advise.