6d66e396a1
The current file parser for a MUMPS routine uses a period "." as the one of the signals that a line of MUMPS code is executable. This is not a correct assumption. Add the period to the list of characters that CTest will not consider the start of a line of code. Update the test routine to have an entry point with code to match the scenario mentioned above.
44 lines
1.1 KiB
Mathematica
44 lines
1.1 KiB
Mathematica
ZZCOVTST;OSEHRA/JPS -- Test routine for Coverage Parsing;4/28/2014
|
|
; (tab) This is series of comments
|
|
; (tab) it should all be not executable
|
|
; (spaces) one of these sets might be a problem
|
|
; (spaces) we will have to see.
|
|
EN ; This entry point shouldn't be found without fixing
|
|
N D
|
|
S D=1 ;An executable line
|
|
D T1^ZZCOVTST
|
|
I '$$T5 W "RETURNED FROM t5",!
|
|
Q
|
|
; This line not executable
|
|
D T6^ZZCOVTST
|
|
;
|
|
T1 ; This line should always be found
|
|
N D
|
|
S D=2
|
|
W !,D,!,"This is the second entry point",!
|
|
D T2^ZZCOVTST(D)
|
|
Q
|
|
;
|
|
T2(EQ) ; This is debatable and only called with ENT^ROU notation
|
|
N D
|
|
S D=3
|
|
W !,D,!,EQ,"This is the third entry point",!
|
|
D T3^ZZCOVTST
|
|
Q
|
|
;
|
|
T3 N D S D=4 W D,!,"Fourth Entry point",! Q
|
|
;
|
|
T4 N D S D=5 W "Shouldn't be executed"
|
|
W "Lots to not do"
|
|
Q
|
|
T5(EQ) ;this entry point is called with a $$ notation
|
|
W "THIS IS THE $$ NOTATION!",!
|
|
Q 0
|
|
T6 ; An entry point to show comments inside of "DO" blocks
|
|
D
|
|
. W "This is executable code",!
|
|
. ;This is a comment inside the do block, not executable
|
|
. S ZZBLAH="blah"
|
|
W "Ending T6",!
|
|
;
|