Commit 10a069b5 (Genex: Fix $<CONFIG> with IMPORTED targets and
multiple locations., 2013-07-15) changed the logic here to include
handling of the MAP_IMPORTED_CONFIG_<CONFIG> target property, but
it was buggy in several ways.
Uppercase the configs in all cases, and compare the mapped configs
with the parameter to the CONFIG genex, instead of with the key of
the mapping.
* The ALIAS name must match a validity regex.
* Executables and libraries may be aliased.
* An ALIAS acts immutable. It can not be used as the lhs
of target_link_libraries or other commands.
* An ALIAS can be used with add_custom_command, add_custom_target,
and add_test in the same way regular targets can.
* The target of an ALIAS can be retrieved with the ALIASED_TARGET
target property.
* An ALIAS does not appear in the generated buildsystem. It
is kept separate from cmMakefile::Targets for that reason.
* A target may have multiple aliases.
* An ALIAS target may not itself have an alias.
* An IMPORTED target may not have an alias.
* An ALIAS may not be exported or imported.
It accepted an optional argument to test for equality, but no way
to get the linker language of a particular target.
TARGET_PROPERTY provides this flexibility and STREQUAL provides
the necessary API for equality test.
Extend the CompileDefinitions test to cover accessing the
property of another target.
9cf3547 Add the INTERFACE_SYSTEM_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES target property.
1925cff Add a SYSTEM parameter to target_include_directories (#14180)
286f227 Extend the cmTargetPropCommandBase interface property handling.
83498d4 Store system include directories in the cmTarget.
f1fcbe3 Add Target API to determine if an include is a system include.
2679a34 Remove unused variable.
Unlike other target properties, this does not have a corresponding
non-INTERFACE variant.
This allows propagation of system attribute on include directories
from link dependents.
Use preprocessor loops and add a unit test for the appropriate
policies. All policies whose value is recorded at target creation
time should be part of this list.
ff015ee Genex: Report error if a target file is needed to evaluate link libraries.
b58aff9 Genex: Extend EvaluatingLinkLibraries to also check the top target name.
b1c19ce Genex: Make LINK_LANGUAGE report an error when evaluating link libraries.
0e1cb07 Add missing return after error report.
If the expression $<TARGET_PROPERTY:prop> appears in the content
of a target property, the target that prop is read from is
the 'head target' of the expression. In contexts such as evaluating
the content of a target property during generation, such
as INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES, the 'head target' is the one on which the
initial request was made.
If evaluating a generator expression which is not a target property
content, the target must be explicitly specified. Such contexts
include add_custom_command and file(GENERATE). The content might
then look like
$<TARGET_PROPERTY:tgt,prop>
However, as there is no HeadTarget set, any generator expressions
evaluated as part of reading prop from tgt which do not specify
the tgt directly report an error.
Modify the logic of the TARGET_PROPERTY generator expression so
that in such contexts, the 'head target' is set to the appropriate
target which was first encountered.
3aa9ce4 GenexEval: Fix evaluation of INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES target property.
0b39fef GenexEval: Extract a getLinkedTargetsContent from TargetPropertyNode.
53164ac cmTarget: Remove some hardcoding of transitive property names.
This property should come from the content of the property itself,
plus the INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES of the link *implementation*.
In contrast, when the INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES is evaluated for
a target, the INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES of the link *interface*
is used.
Similar logic applies for the COMPILE_DEFINITIONS target properties.
If the propertyName is already an INTERFACE_ variant of the property,
ie, the expression is similar to
$<TARGET_PROPERTY:foo,INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES>
then the INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES of the link *interface* of foo
is used.
However, if the propertyName is not an INTERFACE_ variant, and the
interfacePropertyName is, ie, the expression is similar to:
$<TARGET_PROPERTY:foo,INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES>
then the INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES of the link *implementation*
of foo is used.
This will be used to process transitive components of properties
which depend on linked targets. Currently only the link interface
of the target can be used as the source of the linked targets, but
in the next commit it will be possible to use the link implementation
as the source of link targets.
This commit does not change the semantics of the code.
They can't be used when evaluating link libraries, but they can be
used for include directories and compile definitions. Later they can
be used for compile options.
a7ba452 Add the JOIN generator expression.
96ec314 Make it possible for any genex to have arbitrary content at the end.
bd638ee Rename the method determining if a genex accepts arbitrary content.
dc742fe Extract the ProcessArbitraryContent method.
This generator expression joins a list with a separator. The separator
may contain arbitrary content, such as commas, which is ordinarily a
delimiter in the generator expression syntax.
cbf0756 Revert "Add the TARGET_DEFINED generator expression"
21a342c Remove use of TARGET_DEFINED from the target_link_libraries test.
47b8d32 Remove use of TARGET_DEFINED from the ExportImport test.
2e39d21 Remove use of TARGET_DEFINED from target_include_directories test.
8dfdf1c Fix the tests for evaluating includes and defines.
98a6725 Fix constness of accessors.
7e70744 Expand includes and defines transitively in 'external' genexes.
d1a2729 Fix DAG checker finding cycling dependencies.
e72eaad Workaround broken code where a target has itself in its link iface.
ec2c67b Strip stray semicolons when evaluating generator expressions.
This reverts commit 2bee6f5ba5.
This expression is not used, and has a semantic which is not completely
optimal (namely considering utility targets to be targets, though
usually we are interested in linkable targets).
Remove it so that we have more freedom to define better expressions in
the future.
Conflicts:
Source/cmGeneratorExpressionEvaluator.cxx
Tests/CMakeCommands/target_compile_definitions/CMakeLists.txt
Tests/CMakeCommands/target_compile_definitions/consumer.cpp
This means that we can use expressions of the form
$<TARGET_PROPERTY:foo,INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES>
to get a list of the interface include directories of foo, including
those coming from dependencies.
We can't have a test of a target which has a single include directory in
its INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES because the shell on the MSYS platforms transforms
a single include directory to include a prefix, which is not what the test
expects. We test a target with two directories instead as a means to
test a target with no link dependencies.
There is a test for this since commit 8e756d2b (Tolerate cycles in
shared library link interfaces (#12647), 2012-01-12), so make sure
it continues to pass, even as we require no self-references in new
INTERFACE_ property generator expressions.
After evaluating the INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES, of a target in a
generator expression, also read the INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES of
its link interface dependencies.
That means that code such as this will result in the 'user' target
using /bar/include and /foo/include:
add_library(foo ...)
target_include_directories(foo INTERFACE /foo/include)
add_library(bar ...)
target_include_directories(bar INTERFACE /bar/include)
target_link_libraries(bar LINK_PUBLIC foo)
add_executable(user ...)
target_include_directories(user PRIVATE
$<TARGET_PROPERTY:bar,INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES>)
Also process the interface include directories from direct link
dependencies for in-build targets.
The situation is similar for the INTERFACE_COMPILE_DEFINITIONS. The
include directories related code is currently more complex because
we also need to store a backtrace at configure-time for the purpose
of debugging includes. The compile definitions related code will use
the same pattern in the future.
This is not a change in behavior, as existing code has the same effect,
but that existing code will be removed in follow-up commits.
Stephen Kelly
Brad King
Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin