Merge topic 'fix-libarchive-gnutar-large-ids'
ad194ae0
libarchive: Use base-256 encoding for UID/GID like GNU tar does
This commit is contained in:
commit
bb891710cf
|
@ -644,18 +644,18 @@ archive_format_gnutar_header(struct archive_write *a, char h[512],
|
|||
format_octal(archive_entry_mode(entry) & 07777,
|
||||
h + GNUTAR_mode_offset, GNUTAR_mode_size);
|
||||
|
||||
/* TODO: How does GNU tar handle large UIDs? */
|
||||
if (format_octal(archive_entry_uid(entry),
|
||||
h + GNUTAR_uid_offset, GNUTAR_uid_size)) {
|
||||
/* GNU tar supports base-256 here, so should never overflow. */
|
||||
if (format_number(archive_entry_uid(entry), h + GNUTAR_uid_offset,
|
||||
GNUTAR_uid_size, GNUTAR_uid_max_size)) {
|
||||
archive_set_error(&a->archive, ERANGE,
|
||||
"Numeric user ID %jd too large",
|
||||
(intmax_t)archive_entry_uid(entry));
|
||||
ret = ARCHIVE_FAILED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* TODO: How does GNU tar handle large GIDs? */
|
||||
if (format_octal(archive_entry_gid(entry),
|
||||
h + GNUTAR_gid_offset, GNUTAR_gid_size)) {
|
||||
/* GNU tar supports base-256 here, so should never overflow. */
|
||||
if (format_number(archive_entry_gid(entry), h + GNUTAR_gid_offset,
|
||||
GNUTAR_gid_size, GNUTAR_gid_max_size)) {
|
||||
archive_set_error(&a->archive, ERANGE,
|
||||
"Numeric group ID %jd too large",
|
||||
(intmax_t)archive_entry_gid(entry));
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue